| From: Alex Honzen Subject: Jerome Hines and "Modern" Music/Art To: vocalist-at-lists.oulu.fi Send reply to: VOCALIST <vocalist>
I've noticed some discussion in the past about Jerome Hines' book "The 4 Voices of Man," which I also own. Coming off of a conversation I was having with a friend, I thought I would make a post to the list and see what interested parties of various backgrounds would think about this.
Basically, in addition to the information on singing and career that is offered by Hines, he also spends considerable time later in the book talking rather contemptuously (or at least dismissively) about what is referred to as "modern" or abstract music and art. In one anecdote he talks about putting his foot in his mouth (without apology) in an early run-in with composer John Cage. He also talks about a friend's painter daughter, who he speaks condescendingly of because she wouldn't give him a "meaning" for her paintings. His basic take seems to be that these artists are self-serving (and invalid) because they "don't care if others understand what they are creating."
This may not seem to have much to do with singing, but interpretively, it does. Most frequently performed operatic works are (with some exceptions) from the 17 or 1800's and are tonal with a linear storyline. This is also what seems most popular with audiences. I'm curious to know if a lot of people involved with vocal music (as I am) have the same attitude Hines seems to have toward more recent, non-linear and abstracted trends in the arts. I have my own (strong) reaction towards his attitude about this, but I don't want to take up too much bandwidth unless there is additional discussion. So, I'm just throwing this out there. __________________________________________________ Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. All in one place. Yahoo! Shopping: http://shopping.yahoo.com
| |