In a message dated 2/12/2001 1:15:22 PM Eastern Standard Time, buzzcen@a... writes: buzzcen@a... writes:
<< Thanks for clarifying that, but that's not the impression left by the original poster. >>
the original poster, in one post, spoke of involvement and retraction of the false folds. to me, it is obvious they are opposite but, i have read some of the estill factions literature. i have not seen any other literature that addressed the false folds in such a way so, i think the original poster may have not had that clearly explained.
one thing that baffles me about the estill approach is the cricoid tilt used in her approach to belting. i am interested in just what that would do mechanically (as opposed to whether or not it is a good idea).
mike
|
| |