Vocalist.org archive


From:  Reg Boyle <bandb@n...>
Reg Boyle <bandb@n...>
Date:  Sun Jan 21, 2001  8:45 am
Subject:  Re: [vocalist] Re: Velum/Spec analysis/Nasal Res........


Thanks Lloyd. Now I see why it's controversial.

>It is possible to open the nasal port slightly and reduce the effect of the
>nasal area acting as a side branch resonator.

I assume you meant here ..slight opening of the nasal port to introduce
a slight component of the side resonator...?
I accept what you say about singers using this habitually, but doesn't
such a habit risk overuse, as well as being intrinsically less efficient? Sort
of flirting with defective technique. I recall RM telling a soprano to reserve
the French nasal sound for the end of the vowel. I imagine that would be to
ensure that what you describe does not threaten the tone with nasality.

>The soft palate area can be lifted even if the nasal port is slightly open.
>The soft palate area can also be lowered even if the nasal port is closed.

Are you suggesting here that the soft palate is, or can be, used as a means
of interfering with the oropharyengeal volume, just the same as the tongue
does? An active participant in the tuning process, rather than just a
velopharyngeal plug?

Wouldn't this be confined to periods other than the vowel duration?

Regards Reg.



  Replies Name/Email Yahoo! ID Date Size
8585 Re: Velum/Spec analysis/Nasal Res........ Lloyd W. Hanson   Sun  1/21/2001   4 KB
8595 Re: Velum/Spec analysis/Nasal Res........ Reg Boyle   Sun  1/21/2001   3 KB
8596 Re: Velum/Spec analysis/Nasal Res........again taylor23f@h...   Sun  1/21/2001   3 KB

emusic.com