>What next? >Structure of Singing book burnings? (that was sarcasm)
No it wasn't Mark. It was a retort. An angry reply that doesn't call for a response. (Seriously)
The word BAN was not part of my email. That is an extrapolation of yours. My input suggested that putting such inversions in mail was unwise because it presumes that all cultures will be capable of detecting the onset of the writers sudden whim.
Being direct...and clear, is sometimes difficult enough without having to simultaneously jump sarcastic hurdles and perform mental gymnastics as well.
Reg.
|
| |