In a message dated 11/15/2000 9:24:25 AM Central Standard Time,
caioross@z... writes:
caioross@z... writes:
<< A rightist politician in Brazil said something like: "If a guy is sexually
aroused, he should rape, but not kill". That's always quoted by his
political enemies as: "Rape, but don't kill". He obviously meant to say that
that killing after raping is worse than raping only and may be avoided,
since the rapist ( or rapper? :-) ) will have already satisfied his sexual
impulse. >>
Okay, I don't think you've chosen the best possible to quote to defend the
out-of-context statement.... the IN-context statement is pretty offensive all
by itself. Besides, it is well-documented that rape is not necessarily a
crime of sexual passion, but sexual DOMINANCE. If it's just a matter of
satisfying sexual impulse, he should just go home and lock himself in the
bathroom with the Brazilian version of PENTHOUSE.
Christine Thomas
Wauwatosa, WI
<A HREF="http://hometown.aol.com/mezzoid/myhomepage/profile.html">
http://hometown.aol.com/mezzoid/myhomepage/profile.html</A>
"I love to sing-a, about the moon-a and the June-a and the spring-a"
|
|  |
