| I agree with Harris, why change when all is working up fine. Many emails admit they don't mind the ads; many do not mind the teen singer's attitudes (although they have to put up with them). However, at first when we moved to the list, I didn't like it also because of the name of the list "vocalist-temporary". But, consider it another way, it's not bad after all, when we can still share the ideas, and I still can I ask questions and read suggestions and so on. I kind of think that this move might be because some of us are still holding on the old vocalist. But, again, it's just only a thought. I don't mean to judge or say anything, but I don't mind if people here move to another web too. Soon, I know I will just have to resign from the list when I so far see less messages concerning about vocal techniques and more about these little problems -- where to place the group. Yours, Oak -----Original Message-----
From: Robert Harris [mailto:lds@san.rr.com]
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 2:51 PM
To: vocalist-temporary@egroups.com
Subject: [vocalist-temporary] Why change
Hi all,
I'm a "post-Marko" reader of this list, so I don't know how it was before.
But I love vocalist-temporary the way it is now.
What's wrong the way vocalist-temporary is working now? Why does it need to
be changed?
I guess my bias is showing in the way I ask the questions. Its just that I
would hate to see this list "fixed" when, in my opinion, it ain't broken.
Thanks,
Robert Harris |
