Dear Friends, I can't understand why anyone would set foot on stage without being "committed". I sincerely believe everyone who takes that risk - and it is a risk - wants to do the best that they can or they wouldn't be there.
A big difference in how a performance is received depends on the performer understanding that performing is communicating. Communication only takes place when the message is received and both the transmitter and receiver know it.
Everyone, no matter how untalented they are, improves with experience. "Talented" people improve better and faster. "Prepared" people who work hard at the craft often surpass those who are more talented than they.
I have mentioned before that one must have a solid technique in order to be free to create art. The context was singing, but it works the same for acting. I feel that both are inextricably entagled because both are kinds of communication which is, I believe, the ultimate goal. It is important too to understand that it is the performer's best understanding of the lyricist and composer's intent that is to be communicated. This requires homework even on behalf of the most talented.
Warmest regards, Les
|
| |