The opposition between pro-UN countries, mostly European ones, and the US is evident. Not only regarding the eminent war on Iraq and terrorism in general, but also the Kyoto Protocol, Rio+10, world tribunal, etc. That pro-UN countries are for centrally-controlled capitalism and anti-American is evident according to all newspapers and news reports (at least the ones I have access to). That the UN is "fabian" (or "social-democrat") is historical. China and Russia's blatant opposition to the US appears daily in the news.
Not aforementioned, Fidel Castro's attitude to the US is historically evident too: his comdemnation of terrorism but opposition to the US reaction, added to his attempts to establish socialism in Latin America together with Brazilian Presidency candidate, Lula da Silva, and Chávez, Venezuelan president, through "Foro de Sao Paulo". in Spanish: http://www.neoliberalismo.com/forosp.htm, against, and http://orbita.starmedia.com/~lafogata1/sao_paulo/foro8.htm, for it) . Castro's connection with Arafat and even Hussein is also evident.
Just add 1 and 1.
CAio ----- Original Message ----- From: Greypins@a... To: vocalist-temporary@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 1:13 AM Subject: Re: Fw: [vocalist] OFF: NON-AMERICAN REALITY SHOCK: WAS: In Memoriam 9/11
caio,
it sounds like you're in the midst of a war fought by opposing tenured university professors. my advice: by a pump. it sounds a little thin for a shovel.
mike
|
| |