In a message dated 4/6/2002 12:46:59 PM Central Standard Time,
taylor23f@h... writes:
> Randy also wrote:
>
> >(and in that area of
> > the voice TA is not only considered a regulator of pitch but also
> an adductor
> > muscle).
>
> *************
>
> Randy, you may want to check out the Hirano, Vennard, O'Hala study
> from the 70's. I personally have never seen it written anywhere that
> the TA is a regulator of pitch. Quite the opposite, (and taught by
> Vennard, Titze, Austin and others) the TA is always called the
> "register muscle" while the CT is always called the "pitch-muscle."
> I noticed that you did write "in that area." Perhaps you could write
> more on what I quoted.
>
Zemlin states that one of the main purposes of the TA muscle is that of a
(longitudinal) tensor.
Randy Buescher
|
|
|  |
