Vocalist.org archive


From:  Greypins@a...
Date:  Sat Mar 30, 2002  11:02 pm
Subject:  how do you define 'head voice'?

after our recent discussions on registration and whether or not pop
singers ever use head voice, it occured to me that we probably don't have a
concensus on what actually constitutes 'head voice'. i am interested in
knowing how many of you think that it only needs to be a change in behavior
of the vocal folds or, does there have to be an accompanying change in the
resonator as well. do you think is it possible to make a change in vocal
fold behavior without a change in the resonance? (obviously, it is possible
to increase crico-thyroid activity with both low and high larynx which would
affect resonance.)

for this discussion, and really any discussion we would have on
technique, it would be most helpful to cite specific examples. it is my
impression that some of us are in agreement as to what has been written on
the subject but are not in agreement as to what those findings might sound
like. this, of course, leads to a discussion of connecting the research to
the practice.

mike









  Replies Name/Email Yahoo! ID Date  
18347 Re: how do you define 'head voice'?Dean FH Macy   Sun  3/31/2002  
18348 Re: how do you define 'head voice'?KaMeeLaN@a...   Sun  3/31/2002  
18349 Re: how do you define 'head voice'?Dean FH Macy   Sun  3/31/2002  
18351 Re: how do you define 'head voice'?Greypins@a...   Sun  3/31/2002  
18365 Re: how do you define 'head voice'?Lloyd W. Hanson   Sun  3/31/2002  
18372 Re: how do you define 'head voice'?thomas mark montgomery   Sun  3/31/2002  
21316 to: Mark Montgomery WAY BELATED REPLY RE: how do you define 'head voTako Oda takooda Fri  12/6/2002  
21317 Files, was Re: to: Mark Montgomery WAY BELATEDMichael chosdad Fri  12/6/2002  
21318 Help finding Schubert sheet music, Bax recordingKaren Mercedes singwiththespirit Fri  12/6/2002  

emusic.com