In a message dated 2/3/2002 4:43:20 PM Central Standard Time, ODivaTina@a... writes:
> Ah! Now I understand what you mean by 'horoscope' approach. A great term! > It seems to me that the horoscope phenomenon you experienced is because I > began my discussion at a particular point that presupposed that we had > covered all ready the specifics of phonation, resonance, appoggio, > articulation, etc. and that we were past those specifics and on to a more > global sense of the complete package of the singers' form in terms of > registration. If you are interested to discuss things more specifically, > that's fine with me. I tend to naturally, as a person, discuss things in > global terminology. Sometimes if there are mismatches in communication, it > can be due to the "chunk level" (global vs. specific), and it just requires > > one to chunk up or down to where the other is located. > TinaO >
I'd like to know what you mean by global. To me that means it would have the same meaning to all involved which of course imagery does not.
Randy Buescher
|
| |