Isabelle wrote:
vtyc> I can see value in being able to sight-read in vtyc> situations where the music has never been recorded, vtyc> i.e. new music. But this music is often terribly vtyc> difficult to read because of atonality, odd intervals, vtyc> etc. Another useful situation might be when learning vtyc> a piece on tremendously short notice -- but, again, it vtyc> is so much more time-efficient for a singer with a vtyc> good, quick ear (as most singers have) to listen vtyc> through a couple of times and then have it.
I'd like to point out that recordings often have wrong notes in them! I have, several times, listened to recordings of difficult pieces which I was in the process of learning and realized that the performer sang wrong notes and/or rhythms. It is my ability to look at a score and know what the notes ought to sound like, and my ability to double check that against a piano, which serves me best. Recordings are helpful for overall context, especially when I am away from my accompanist, and for stylistic ideas, but I don't rely on them that much until I already know the piece well.
Vicki Bryant Naperville, IL
|
| |