In a message dated 4/26/2001 3:20:17 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
LYNDA313@a... writes:
LYNDA313@a... writes:
<< Mike, it has to do with the NATS code of ethics. I imagine that is the
basis under which they became "involved" in the situation. >>
designed more to protect the teacher's roster than the interests of the
student, in my opinion. unless, the student is a member of NATS, i don't
see how they have the right to interfere with her.
thanks for the answer lynda.
mike
|
|  |
