Mike, it has to do with the NATS code of ethics. I imagine that is the basis
under which they became "involved" in the situation.
In a message dated Thu, 26 Apr 2001 1:42:00 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
Greypins@a... writes:
Greypins@a... writes:
<< In a message dated 4/26/2001 12:53:04 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
lasharp@n... writes:
lasharp@n... writes:
<< Neither of us had any idea that it was an uncool thing to do. It made Sara
feel more confident, and better prepared, but our teacher and the vocal
dept. felt that it was
deceptive, unprofessional, and um...simply not done. NATS got involved, the
other teacher said she thought Sara was doing it with the knowledge of her
teacher and also disowned her for the trouble that was caused. >>
laura,
as much as i think this situation is totally sick, unfortunately, i
think it is very common (i'm sure stalin is grinning in his grave knowing his
methods live on).
on what legal basis did NATS get involved? did sara make any legally
binding agreement that she would not consult other teachers? (or, is this
another case of stalin grinning?)
mike
ps. i hope you have both recovered fully
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>
|
|  |
