Vocalist.org archive


To: VOCALIST <vocalist>
Date sent: Sat, 11 Dec 1999 11:43:08 -0000
Subject: Re: E-mail addresses (was: RE: HUMOR: Christmas Songs...)
Send reply to: VOCALIST <vocalist>

Hello all

Please note that the VOCALIST mailing list automatically sets a
"reply to" field in the header of the emails that we receive. The
"reply to" field in an email header is seperate to the "from" field in
the header.

Therefore, all email programs should show that the message is
>From the person who originally sent it, but they will always send the
reply back to vocalist

I hope that little bit of techy jargon helps clear things up.

I left my computing life for music and singing, so I am desperately
trying not to be technical.

UNIX ? errr, let me guess, a group of castrato singers?

John
AKA A Baritone...... who, little me?


> I use Outlook for WIN 98 also and mine does this. I wonder what the
> difference is?

> > BTW: To reply to an unsigned post privately, just reply as you normally
> > would. The sender's email address will appear in the body of your
> > reply and you can paste it in.
>
> I use Outlook for Win 98, and the only way I can get someone's address is to
> open the message (vs. just reading it in the preview pane) and it appears as
> part of the header. Replying only shows the vocalist address and the name of
> the person who sent it (unless they have their e-mail address set to show in
> their name field). I think this will vary with each e-mail program.
>
> Jennifer
>
>
>